With some new justices, you need a little while to figure out where they fit in, Here you'll get a lot of signals very early.

On some of these questions there is a reasonable suspicion or a reasonable hint that a new appointment might swing those decisions the other way. And so that is why people on both sides of the political aisle are intently following this and agitating over it.

It's really industrial policy. The notion that it could be efficient is crazy.

Any industry that confronts cases under consumer protection statutes ? and that is every industry in America ? will breathe a huge sigh of relief after this ruling.

I can't talk about the Langone case in particular, but there is a pattern: everything that goes to trial, and ends up in court, he loses.

Especially if it is someone with a very creative and influential mind.

This is a particularly urgent situation and it looks like the military is the only thing that's functioned in this entire mess. Once they arrived, things turned around.

It's been the longest-sitting nine-member court in history. They've all played the same cards, and nothing is gained.