There is absolutely no question that as far as young children go, 'filtering in' is an infinitely safer proposition than 'filtering out'. It may take time for such a space to evolve, but in the end it would provide protections that would far exceed the illusory ones claimed by the proponents of .xxx.

We're pleased with some of it. We're confused with other parts of it.

The issue of dating and cruising sites, yes, if in fact they are not creating the images themselves, are protected as secondary producers.

It is the other way around. You may have to buy your domain in order to protect your trademark or brand, and only then are the policies forced upon you. They are as yet vague and undefined, so yes, we are concerned about de facto regulation disguised as self-regulation.