It is our priority to figure out whether the data used in the experiments had been falsified or not.

The data . . . was intentionally fabricated, not an accidental error, and this constituted major misconduct.

Based on these findings, the data in 2005 was intentionally fabricated, not an accidental error.

The patient-matching stem cells no longer exist.

We believe that the number of eggs he used was far more than he has reported.

This matter is grave enough to shake the very foundations of scientific research.

We are looking into how many human eggs were used in his research, but so far we have found that the number of eggs exceeds the ones presented in the Science paper.

None of the stem cells were patient-specific.

We determined that this is a grave misconduct that damages the foundation of science.