They don't provide any data to substantiate their claim.
We know that these chemicals are toxic. And we know that they're exceeding the levels the government has set for these chemicals in water.
Major shifts in transportation priorities are essential to achieving energy independence and maintaining national security, ... A serious commitment to rail and transit has been a missing element in the U.S. strategy to reduce our dependence on Middle East oil.
Hundreds of thousands of women would get unsafe exposures to mercury if they followed the FDA's advice and ate freely of all fish in the food supply except the four that they've prohibited during pregnancy.
It's a major public health failing on (the FDA's) part, ... and we feel quite strongly that they need to aggressively look into the problem of mercury contamination of fish, expand the list of fish that women need to avoid and get this information out to the medical community and to women in a much more aggressive way.
This information is not being adequately disseminated to pregnant women. If the food pyramid can't get it right, how can ordinary Americans?
Notably, they don't give us the data.
Our concern is that this is a very unique chemical. It lasts, literally, for eternity, and now it has been determined to be a likely human carcinogen. That ranks it up there with DDT, PCBs and dioxin as a very serious hazard. It needs to be banned.
Copyright © 2024 Electric Goat Media. All Rights Reserved.