At 65 mph, that closing speed between vehicles is pretty significant.

The intersection meets the criteria for a crash location. So it will be funded entirely with federal and NDOT funds.

It's more expensive than a signal, but again, I think it's safer. It lowers speeds and it's more efficient.

When drivers are trying to keep track of who goes next, they're not looking for pedestrians.

We've been doing studies since 1995 and it still doesn't meet the criteria. It's not in the tool box as an option.

It's not illegal to drive round and round, but it gets pretty boring after two or three times.

It would be unacceptable to leave it there if it didn't work. We would come down and take it out or modify it.

We do not turn signals off and on.