Giving money to a candidate or a party that is sure to lose is not as politically useful as giving money to a candidate or a party where your contribution might make a difference. Catching up when you're the party out of power is always harder.

I would think (such questions) would cross anybody's mind. I'd be very surprise if it didn't.

All you need is a weak Republican year for Democrats to be competitive in southern Indiana. And this is a weak Republican year.

The fact is that whatever fallout there is, good or bad, will be laid at the feet of Republicans.

DHL customers are increasingly looking for morning deliveries of their time-sensitive shipments to Asia. This new service offers a unique connection between more than 100 cities in 22 European countries and the business centers of Asia-Pacific.

There's the public rationale: If you've donated to both sides, you're interested in good government. Then there's the not-so-public rationale: You want your phone calls returned no matter who wins.