The city has the right to regulate on behalf of the residents. We are still trying to analyze what the decision will mean to the ordinance.

It's one of those situations that's a balancing test. We have technology on one hand and aesthetics on the other. Everyone wants [cell phone] coverage. But where do you draw the line? At what point do we sacrifice aesthetics for progress?

We don't need to create the scar, because the technology itself will be outdated. Does the city then become a grand and glorious broom-pusher following behind cell companies cleaning up the problems?

There are numerous cities throughout the country involved in disagreements with Sprint [Wireless].

Everyone's so dedicated to making sure that whatever happens is in the best interest of the city and its residents, which is obviously 180 degrees from Sprint's view.