I don't think the criticism that this agreement has been geared to further augment (India's) strategic nuclear program holds water.

On New Year's Day 1992 there was no more a Soviet Union. We had to start all over again with a new set of people.

It is a unique agreement, but I don't think it is a risky agreement. Now we are doubly concerned, because a new dimension has been added. That is the fear of weapons of mass destruction ending up in the wrong hands _ terrorist organizations.

I would say it is not only an act of statesmanship but an act of faith. Both our countries were departing from something which has been well ingrained in the mind-sets of most of our people. We knew there was going to be significant opposition to change. Change is always viewed with suspicion and often viewed as subversive.

The likelihood of that is remote because this is one relationship where ... you don't have difficulty in reconciling principle and practice or the vital national interests with values.