He does have that evidence, ... If it established complicity or pattern, he will be in a position to make that determination. But we'll have to await his report for that.

You don't have to say you don't want him back if you're only bringing forward to your minister negative considerations.

[The] report, with its detailed description of acts of torture, makes for difficult reading, but it is extremely important that it is now part of the record of this inquiry.

I don't ever recall receiving any instructions with respect to caveats being down.

The commission had little appreciation of how much information would be subject to national security confidentiality claims.