This is significant because these people that invested $100 million are now being faced with bills by Legislature that say these machines are to go away.

These same people who invested nearly $100 million are now being faced with bills at the Legislature that says these machines are to go away.

Not only do we think the state would be liable, we think it would be a horrible business practice for the state to decide they would like to go back on promises made in contracts with private individuals.

We are concerned that it might be unconstitutional. Obviously, we would have to leave that up to the judicial system to make the final determination.

We're letting the lawyers do the talking.

The problem that all of us are trying to figure out is: When did out-of-state casinos become more important than in-state small businesses? We tried to persuade the Senate, and we tried to persuade the House. . . . We are now going to try to persuade the governor.

I guess it means we will have to pursue our judicial branch option. We would have liked to continue talking about our options.

Small businesses, I can guarantee you, would be very upset if the Legislature chooses to ban a program that is legal, has been in effect for four years with full government oversight and full legislative explanation.