What we have is better than nothing, but it may not be sufficient to save the lake.

We added some verbiage that water quality (should be protected) for purposes of human enjoyment as well as (preservation). It was in recognition that we're preserving this area for use - not just to put it on a museum shelf.

We are all looking forward to seeing the results from these studies. That's what everyone wants to know: if we do this, what kind of benefit can we count on?