We're on the record as saying ... that Mr. Clinton and his surrogates have already engaged in perjury, subornation of perjury and obstruct of justice and that evidence gives us a right to a legal presumption that Mr. Clinton's entire case is weak and unfounded. Therefore, there was error and the case should go to a jury.

We would pursue it to the extent the law entitles us to.

Ms. Willey features very prominently in our filing today.

You can show a pattern and practice of prior conduct involving the same type of conspiracy to approach women through the use of state troopers ... to provide sexual favors. That's a pattern and practice that gives rise to an inference that there has been a conspiracy and an agreement to do that with respect to Ms. Jones.

We don't think that anyone can predict how the 8th Circuit will rule based on the questioning. We do think that a number of legal issue were brought to the forefront. It appears that the judges are very interested ... in whether Mrs. Jones' version of the conduct of Mr. Clinton in that hotel room was severe or not.