I'm very encouraged because I think this is a serious proposal that warrants a serious response from the [tort] claimants and it represents a substantial step forward in the case.

This leads to a complete misrepresentation of fact. From the public's standpoint, there is an implication that owners are getting a cut of the proceeds. People read this in the press and they believe what they read.

I would characterize it differently. We think that it's a positive development. It's a message to all sides that time has come to engage in serious negotiations.