I don't know at this point. We didn't discuss that.

We didn't want the city to have a problem. P.E.O. wanted to give something to the community, and were careful they didn't leave the city with a liability.

Seemingly small decisions help enforce the bigger picture and the bank should know better.

If she misses the next meeting, it's automatic that she vacates the seat.

We have done a tremendous increase. This is a lot nicer than a couple of years back when we had to talk about some decreases in our results.

These are complex issues that will require complex solutions.

The preponderance of our failures were tree-related.

It'd be nice if we could get (the P.E.O. property) in the hands of the city so they can do what they want with it.

We don't anticipate this problem with our next project, ... But for future disposal, we will have to look at waterways.