It's been a strong source of inspiration for the divers. We usually dive in zero visibility and very bad conditions. We know if the family who suffered that loss is able to rise above that to help us help people better, it gives us a better way to focus on what we need to do to help more people.
Why is this particular group making an assertion when they are not claiming to be Broderick Boys and not claiming to be directly affected by the injunction?
I'm just surprised there was no public comment before the motion. Generally, you make a motion and second it and call for public input.
When we're talking about market instruments, then we are much more favorably inclined to emissions trading than we are to taxes and charges.
The public has to be protected from these unscrupulous practices.
The NASE was not an independent entity. It was a marketing ruse.
They are going to reduce privacy if these various measures go through.
What they will do is capture all kinds of other people in their net and reduce our privacy in the process, ... This is government we are talking about and government tends to use whatever it has.
Instead of taking divers out and searching all over the place near the house boat, we can use the sonar to identify hotspots we need to go to and utilize our resources more efficiently.
Copyright © 2024 Electric Goat Media. All Rights Reserved.