The investigation did not find any conclusive evidence of wrongdoing by the athlete. We (the BCU) acknowledged the elevated levels of testosterone, but there was also enough evidence to suggest that natural physiological reasons may have been responsible for the fluctuation.

The track here is not suitable to prepare them for the Games and the whole idea is to make them accustomed to the smaller, tighter track. This is 47 degrees at its steepest and calls for a lot more control and concentration so we want to make them comfortable on that type of surface.

This is a now a matter between the UCI and the BCU, not between the athlete and the UCI, so I'm sure the BCU will need a serious presence of experts to present their case when the time comes.

I really have no idea how long this process will take, but I'm sure the matter will be expedited.