We didn't think the government would have enough evidence. I don't think any of it is damaging.

You would think the government would be able to produce direct evidence that my client attended a training camp. They cannot because that evidence does not exist.

The underlying allegations are really just the same, but relabeled. The government has been investigating my client since 2002. You would think that by this time they would be able to prove that he actually attended a terrorist camp. They haven't.

The government's conduct coupled with the widespread national media attention this case has received confirms that the defendants could not have a fair trial with an impartial jury anywhere in the United States.

He said what he said because he thought he was providing the government with what they wanted to hear. The evidence will show that the government will not and cannot show any proof that he attended.

He said what he said because he thought he was telling the government what they wanted to hear.

It was a little bit of an intimidating situation. Essentially, I walked into a small conference room with about 10 Muslim religious leaders, all men, whom I had not met before.

The government has shown no evidence that he actually attended; the government has failed to prove its case. Ladies and gentlemen, you can't prove what never happened.

I don't really think we necessarily need much more.