Were written in disappearing ink.
The smart money is that the Supreme Court granted this case to reverse.
We argued that 18 is the natural age. It's an age that's reflected almost universally whenever legislatures have to find a dividing line between adolescence and adulthood, for purposes of driving, and signing contracts and entering marriage agreements and things like that.
The case has not been made to overrule Miranda.
Not a day goes by when I don't hear Janet Reno's voice in my head saying 'we're going to be criticized anyway so why don't we just do the right thing,'.
The Line-Item Veto Act is hardly revolutionary, ... The act simply gives the president a measure of discretion over the expenditure of appropriated funds.
The Internet threatens to give every child with access to an interactive computer a free pass into the equivalent of every adult bookstore and video outlet in the country.
This is not an example of a president repealing a provision of a law that Congress has enacted ... but exercising a discretionary authority that Congress has given him.
We think that stability in the law is important ... certainly the court has recognized Miranda provides that.
Copyright © 2024 Electric Goat Media. All Rights Reserved.