One by one they have slowly but surely been dismissed by the courts or withdrawn by the plaintiffs.

The issues aren't new, the claim isn't new, ... The assertion at the core of this is groundless and unsubstantiated by the science.

The Swedish analysis is of data that has previously been reported. It's not based on new data.

There are always design modifications...to increase proficiency of the phones, but we certainly are not trying to build anything into our products as a protection [against] any alleged or perceived health risk.

There is no credible, reliable scientific evidence to support a claim on the injuries that have been put forward.