We're delighted to hear the offer.

Our primary goal is ensuring [Stone] can go to work in peace.

This is another instance of Intel's illegal monopolization strategy.

The community spoke out loudly against discrimination and the MTA responded appropriately. We couldn't have asked for a better outcome.

Using the bathroom is one of the most intimate and personal experiences someone has in the course of their day. We stand with Helena against bigotry and will fight for her right to use a restroom consistent with her gender identity and persona.

Not only is this anticompetitive -- it's illegal. It's illegal because a monopoly, under antitrust law, is prohibited from engaging in anticompetitive -- not to mention anti-consumer -- business practices designed to maintain their monopoly position.

We expect that the evidence it collects of Intel's Korean business practices will be made available to AMD, as will be the case in Japan, and that ultimately Intel will have to respond to it in the US litigation.

It seems that an extra line of code was added to check to see what processor is in the computer ... apparently at the request of Intel. We want to know if this is another example of Intel trying to proliferate its monopoly. If it is, the public needs to know that.