He should not be held responsible for the acts of his co-defendant at all.

It would still be red when he landed.

Although they were united in their defense, there were occasions when their strong and unwavering personalities clashed, ... The prospect of the death penalty in California apparently cased the schism between the mother and son.

He's in physical pain, he's in emotional pain. He recognizes the tragedy here, but he's not responsible for it.

The brother is doing everything possible to get control of the estate and knock Diane Wells out.

He didn't shoot a gun. He didn't even have a gun.

The only acceptable resolution in the case would be a complete dismissal.

This case is about a selfish man - her son - who has manipulated his mother and used her as a pawn to satisfy his insatiable need for money.

Mike Tyson was provoked and verbally and physically attacked. His actions were justifiable.