As the state Department of Health has existing links to pharmacies, it would be most efficient to house and administer the site there. However, the attorney general's office welcomes the opportunity to provide this necessary service to the people of New York.

We are disappointed that the court has taken an unduly narrow view of its power and obligation to decide cases that come before it. Because the science is clear that global warming poses a real and inevitable environmental threat with grave human consequences, we will appeal this decision and continue to work on other fronts to demand action on this critical problem.

UPS is such a large (shipping) player that it made sense to us, if we're trying to bring the shipping industry in line with state and federal laws, if you have UPS on your side, you are closer to achieving that goal.

My understanding is that the law in New York is very vague when it comes to price gouging.

When that audit is complete we'll get a copy of it. Our office will review it, and we'll take appropriate action if action is warranted.

Our case is strong, and we fully expect to prevail.

We're not sure how we can do that legally or logistically. How do we sift through all the claims to determine which ones have merit? We have a process ahead to figure that out.

It's at the top of the pile.

We're preparing for trial in this matter with Mr. Greenberg. Today's settlement with AIG and the suit against Mr. Greenberg both orbit around the same set of facts, but they're separate issues now.