There could be some small level of competition but I don't think there will be much conflict. The two lines complement themselves.

You're close to your suppliers, and you've got a very capable available work force. It all enhances the efficiency of a global business.

We don't think it represents a significant change in the sense that we'll continue to grow organically.

As far as their marketing goes, that's marketing. We continue to have a very solid relationship with Intel and nothing has changed in that respect. We probably are their largest customer; we shipped 10 million systems in the fourth quarter. I don't think any supplier is going to ignore a customer that is building that many systems and using that many of their parts in them.

We feel good about our ability to continue to grow profitably.

We realize that as we grow our business in India, it'll require a manufacturing facility.

We're just not going to comment because it is an ongoing court matter.

What he is saying is that $80 billion remains a viable and reachable goal. He's not being as specific as to the timeline.

They serve a particular part of the market that . . . we can reach as well. But if you look at the two products, they're not the same products. We can both exist well serving that space.