A classical guerrilla-type campaign.

It will be different in different places. In some places, governments are strong, Iraqi units are good, the ethnic balance is benign, (and) they are already running things.

It's going to be some of the hardest, bare-knuckled politics that has taken place ever in the Arab world. They play hardball.

We must help others in the region help themselves by promoting self-reliant partners who are willing to face the enemy.

It makes sense that as NATO forces go in, and they're more in numbers, that we could drop some of the U.S. requirements somewhat.

The enemy that brought us 9/11 continues to represent one of the greatest dangers to this nation.

Tell them we are winning, ... You don't define success as the absence of hard losses. You define it - are you defeating the enemy?

The important thing is whether or not the overall movement towards stability and security is falling more and more in the hands of the Iraqis.

When we continue to pick at the wound and show the pictures over and over again it just creates the image ? a false image ? like this is the sort of stuff that is happening anew, and it's not.