He can't outspend us, he doesn't have a grass-roots network like ours, and he's got no credibility on the issues. So how does that make him a front-runner?

If they want to criticize us for having only one opinion on an issue instead of two or three, we'll take it.

This is a two-heat race. If you don't win the prelims, you don't get to run the finals.

They're wrong. It's based on turnout, not total registered voters. Their lawyers are going to say it's not this, it's that; our lawyers will disagree. And we believe, if anyone takes it to court, our lawyers would prevail.

I think they're being misled.

We plan to make an announcement (this) week.