The last thing we can afford to do is give another reason for the intelligence and law-enforcement communities not to share info with its customers on the front lines, ... Culturally these communities have adhered to the 'need to know' - in order to protect sources, methods, preserve criminal investigations, etc. [But] we've got to provide incentives to ensure the 'need to share.' .

Terrorism first and foremost is a psychological weapon aimed at undermining policies and values. It's a tough balance.

We have trained against similar scenarios, but it's not the same as a crisis unfolding before your eyes.

It's so much more complicated than everyone's making it out to be. The federal response has been quite coordinated. It's how it interfaces with the state and local.

He combines high-tech means with very rudimentary means. That makes following his tracks a very daunting task.

The government should be getting its own house in order first.

We'll never be in a position where we can protect everything, all the time. We can't afford it, and we don't want to infringe on the values we're trying to preserve.

There are a whole host of factors that you can practice against. But to be honest, it's not the same as living through it.

You want to go beyond simply guards, guns, gates. You want things that have a capacity on the equipment side to last. It's making sure that what you buy can actually be sustained.