"Christopher Wolf" is an United States/American attorney specializing in Internet and privacy law. He is a partner in the international law firm of Hogan Lovells US LLP. He is the founding editor and lead author of the first Practising Law Institute (PLI) legal treatise on privacy and information security law. He is the founder and co-chair of a think tank devoted to emerging privacy issues, the Future of Privacy Forum. He also has chaired an international consortium of NGO's fighting online hate speech, the International Network Against Cyber-hate (INACH), on whose board her serves and he leads the work of the Anti-Defamation League in fighting online hate speech. Wolf graduated from Bowdoin College in 1976, and magna cum laude from Washington & Lee University School of Law in 1980. He clerked with the Hon. Aubrey E. Robinson, Jr., United States District Court, District of Columbia, 1980-1982.

In 2013, Wolf co-authored (with Abraham Foxman) a book enitled Viral Hate: Containing its Spread on the Internet (Macmillan Palgrave).

More Christopher Wolf on Wikipedia.

The way the court resolved this was correct. This decision shows how the law can be practical.

I think the White House should be aware of this and do what is necessary (to reverse the decision).

I think it's a very good development in terms of expanded use of the Internet. It's certainly an improvement over the predecessor, which was clearly rolled out too early.

There's no hard and fast rule in these cases. People do rush into litigation too quickly, generally speaking, but in this case, it was right that it went to the courts, and the court made the right decision.

When an indictment is delivered at the front door of the White House, the Office of the President is defiled. No citizen can take pleasure from that.

I am deeply disturbed by this vindictive and unfair prosecution. The investigation should never have begun.

I can't say it with 100% certainty that every code can correspond with everything unless you know the key and the only person who knows the key is the person who made the code. But it sounds very reasonable to assume that it's correct.