Bruce Fein
FameRank: 4

"Bruce Fein" is a [http://www.brucefeinlaw.com lawyer] in the United States who specializes in United States Constitution/constitutional and international law. Fein has written numerous articles on constitutional issues for The Washington Times, Slate.com, The New York Times, Legal Times, and is active on the issues of civil liberties. He has also worked for the American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage Foundation, both conservative think tanks, as an analyst and commentator.

Fein is a principal in a government affairs and public relations firm, The Lichfield Group, in Washington, D.C..

{{cite web /url=http://thelichfieldgroup.com/principals/ /title=The Lichfield Group - Principals

More Bruce Fein on Wikipedia.

He is a man who is not tortured by doubt over the correctness of his judicial philosophy.

What you find is that the U.S. Supreme Court very seldom if ever marches very far from the conventional thinking of contemporary society. They pay attention and are infected by mainstream thinking of what's moral and what's right and what's just.

You can't have two ballots that are identical ... and have (them) counted in one way in one county and another way in another county.

Giants who change the philosophy of law and have spoken about changing ideas.

The tipping point in Washington is when you go from being a subject of caricature to the subject of laughter. She's in danger of becoming the subject of laughter.

Denigration of the president.

Justice Thomas, in public speeches, has said one thing that has awed him is that he has never heard ever a syllable out ... of any justice even insinuating that politics was influencing their vote, ... I'm not saying they are taking vacations together or anything like that ... but the civility of the discourse remains the same.

Here, insofar as there is discrepancy, it is not like the others that are politically neutral, ... Here, it is patently likely to favor one candidate or another.

Bush may be aiming now for the political choice - a choice that's calculated less to mold the Supreme Court jurisprudence, and more to mold his political fortunes and those of his party.