The promise of the platform is that thousands of distributors would be unable to cheat 180Solutions and 180 users.

Automated analysis is probably the better way to figure out what Web sites are hostile. Robots are just staggeringly more efficient at these tasks.

I have concluded that 180's business model is fundamentally broken -- that 180 cannot implement technology or enforcement to assure the proper installation of its software. Accordingly, just as CDT [Center for Democracy & Technology] terminated its discussions with 180, I have resolved not to tell 180solutions which specific distributor was responsible for this installation.

Packet logs and the video together are overwhelming proof.

Revenue sources is the area where I am most excited about and focused on right now. How do these programs make money? Who buys these ads?

It's very easy to hack S3. It just takes one line of code.

That's not a compelling legal defense. The fact that you've stopped doing something is not a defense.

The advertisers need to be aware that they are not getting their money's worth -- they have a contract that said they are paying for one thing and they are getting another.

That's a public relations defense, not a legal defense.