It's not the mischief in this case that would cause the (Supreme) Court to be worried. It's the next case or the case after that where there isn't a clerical mistake but there's an effort to deceive or change the result.

Each house has to pass the whole law and the same law. This is a case where the Constitution is very clear.

The fact that she's a successful lawyer doesn't mean she's going to do a good job as a Supreme Court justice. To use a baseball analogy, just because somebody is a good shortstop doesn't mean you put him in as a pitcher.

There was certainly a question when Judge Thomas was nominated. He hadn't written a lot of legal opinions. But people chose not to take on Thomas on those grounds.

The jet hit some approach lights in Flushing Bay. After that, the nose gear collapsed and the plane started to skid (and) came to a stop at the east end of the airport.

We don't know how wide this electronic vacuum cleaner is sweeping.

John Roberts is a very careful and good lawyer, and I think the facts (of each case) will matter to him.

We're just trying to cut every possible expense that we can. Most people just see Ritter Park and don't think about everything else we do. It's very complex and complicated and there's got to be a solution because I can't give up.