(Intel) withdrew the how-to manual from three of its customers in a very selective, targeted fashion, simply to retaliate against these three companies because they refused to license their patents for rival technologies to Intel.

Intel responded not just by defending itself in court, but by cutting off technical information that Digital needed to design computers that use the Intel chips, ... (Intel) also demanded return of microprocessor prototypes and it refused to supply additional prototypes.

Consumers need to have access to this new and innovative form of marketing.

Dave Smith Motors of Kellogg, Idaho, was attracting customers from around the Northwest and taking substantial sales from.

Consumers have won today, ... And competition has been preserved.

Intel deliberately sought to injure these companies in order to secure their technology.

This is a powerful club Intel wields because it is a monopolist, ... These customers have no other alternative (than) the Intel microprocessors they use in their leading-edge systems.

Intel became a success by competing its way to the top, ... Once there, it cannot change the rules of the game so that no one else has a shot.

There are remaining issues under investigation by the commission. The commission's staff is committed to working expeditiously to resolve those concerns.