It's very common for the governments to send people checks after disasters and three years of Mark Sanford as governor has certainly been a disaster.

Obviously, the mayor feels competition and is adjusting to meet it. Does that mean he's in trouble? You can't draw that conclusion. You can draw that there's a real competition here.

As a part of our campaign, we're launching a series of real-people, paper-plate dinners.

He feels extremely apologetic about the entire incident and wants to make it absolutely clear that he is not above the law. Surrendering whatever rights is just a part of that apology to make sure the public understands that he in no way is above the law.

For Lovelace to beat Sanford on June 13, we have to have a strong grassroots campaign. And political signs are one of the most important tools of a grassroots campaign.

He's suspect among the more conservative elements, and appears to be working hard to erase those suspicions. But the Bush wing will definitely NOT line up behind him, having more to do with local personalities than McCain himself.

He's using taxpayers' own money to buy votes. It's common for governments to send checks after disasters, and three years of Sanford is a disaster.

I guess she changed her mind about shopping at Wal-Mart.

Our best sources say they're unconstitutional. We're trying to comply with local ordinances where we can, but we're also trying to stand up for the rights of free speech.