Paul Cambria
FameRank: 4

"Paul Cambria" is a Buffalo, New York based criminal defense and appellate Lawyer/attorney specializing in First Amendment to the United States Constitution/First Amendment issues who has represented various figures and companies within the pornography industry as well as many prominent white collar defendants. Cambria received his Juris Doctorate degree from University of Toledo College of Law in 1973 where he graduated first in his class and a BA from State University of New York at Fredonia in 1969. He has been named one of the best lawyers in America for over 25 consecutive years. He is the past president of the New York state criminal defense lawyers' association and has argued several cases before the United States Supreme Court. He is admitted to the bar in New York and California.

A partner at the Buffalo based law firm Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria, he practices in the areas of Criminal Trials, Appeals, Constitutional Law, First Amendment, Zoning, Antitrust, and Professional Licensing Defense. His practice is nationwide and he divides his time between the firm's offices in Buffalo and Los Angeles. He has represented many prominent individuals including publisher Larry Flynt and musicians DMX (rapper)/DMX and Marilyn Manson, and bio-artist Steve Kurtz.(Anthony J. Previty) Wyoming County Sheriffs Office

More Paul Cambria on Wikipedia.

Some people lie about it. It's their way of excusing personally unacceptable conduct -- 'It wasn't me, it was porn.

223

I think any adult producer would agree.

200

I take that as a message and mandate to my clients that we should do that. I might welcome a shot across the bow rather than one between the eyes.

152

The form of entertainment is no problem. There are individuals who are going to react abnormally to normal material, but it's not a problem for the average person.

147

It's lawful adult expression that is accepted in America in both the marketplace of ideas and the commercial marketplace.

130

It is my hope that my remarks will bring some balance to a discussion before this Congress that is too often dominated by a vocal minority intent on vilifying expression protected by our Constitution.

93