I think the key point is that voters will only support a good project. Regardless of these kinds of things, if the need is there, voters will approve it.

Most districts like to balance specifics and catchall. Primarily they use the catchall for the opportunity to use additional earnings that might come from the bond for purchasing lands or other facility needs.

It's adequate to describe proposals generally, which is something that came from the Idaho Supreme Court's decision. But most districts include a catchall that gives some legal flexibility.

I've been very pleased with the YMCA program and the YMCA staff. I'm hoping there will be some discussions with parents about this, if changes are made.