He's given himself as much potential as he could. There's been nothing really bad that's happened to him, and he's got a budget surplus and a lot of popularity.

They need to look at what kinds of bills their legislator passed. Also, there are a lot of reasons to put forward a bill that does not pass, which are not necessarily negative.

He's not a go-along, get-along type of person. Especially at this stage in his career, he would not be persuaded by (politics) if he genuinely believes they have a mandate to close bases.

I think this is an incredible resource for voters to look at, but they do need to look at it with some perspective.

But if I were a pure pragmatist for my own district and didn't worry so much about party as I did results, this shows it would work against you to vote for a Democrat.

The Hinckley Institute of Politics means so much to so many people, the celebration is a way for all 4,000 interns and public officials to come together and think about where we have been and where we are going. It's also recognition and appreciation for the incredible philanthropy the Hinckley family has shown.

Both parties have just become experts at setting each other up on every piece of legislation. Rep. Matheson voted the way they wanted him to (in the final vote), but they still find a way to attack him because he didn't do it exactly the way they wanted him to.

It's always interesting that we give money back to the bad guys.