In a way, Israel was following the American lead with respect to links with China, including sales of military equipment and technology.

For the short-term, there is also I think a political symbol for the region that says we are working together and the noose around Iraq is closing.

The U.S. has abruptly changed its policies in the last couple of years. It took Israel a little while to follow and realize how serious these issues are to the U.S.

Until the Palestinians can show that they can act against the terrorist groups, there is going to be a consensus not to give more. If things are quiet for six months then we could begin to see action.

These issues are extremely important for the broad Israeli population, and those who choose not to vote are registering a protest against both candidates -- not necessarily fatigue.

The fact (that) those hard-liners were able to roll out those missiles in public in Iran sends a signal, I think, to the Iranian public and the rest of the world and Israel that says 'Look out,'.

Sharon has reshaped himself as the ultimate centrist Israeli prime minister.

There is even less of a potential for political resolution or stability and therefore that indicates a greater likelihood of unilateral steps.

He wants to do things, he wants to continue with the disengagement process.