I would think they would want to hear these cases rather soon, if the right kind of legal challenge is presented [to the justices]. These are incredibly important issues that need to be resolved.
It's to have an exhaustive look at the matter, not only from the standpoint of potentially assigning responsibility but finding out what happened and making recommendations of a systemic nature so that it doesn't happen again.
How do you get there from here? They haven't persuaded me that this is valid, ... You have to have a disruption of civil authority before the military can perform activities such as surveillance.
We will have the equivalent of 'letters de cachet'.
I think many people have come to conclude that the Supreme Court did nobody any favors by failing to move the ball further down the field.
Basically, you're not supposed to lay your hands on a recruit. You don't really want to have drill instructors grabbing a recruit by the collar, which is what happened here, and you don't want to have them hitting them with elbows.
The administration has shown itself a number of times capable of changing course and speed in response to actual or feared legal developments, be it in the courts or in Congress. This may be another illustration of that tendency.
This is in itself an important reaffirmation of the rule of law, however it comes out.
You have the opportunity for internal renditions.
Copyright © 2024 Electric Goat Media. All Rights Reserved.