Basically we're asking you to call it a MORB instead of a MARB. Using the term mining advancement implies a bias. I believe mining oversight would be more suitable.

We all had agreed on specific language that would note at what point a violation would occur - once it was found that groundwater had been contaminated. As it stands right now, as long as the company fills out a report and identifies a plan for remediation, there will be no violation. It was so important to us that a mining company/operator be fully accountable for their actions.