We're going to be very conscious of where this data is located.

The real work of domain name system happens in a very distributed, very decentralized way.

In deciding how best to approach the Chinese - or any - market, we must balance our commitments to satisfy the interests of users, expand access to information, and respond to local conditions.

We intend to disclose to users when information has been removed from our search results in response to local laws and regulations.

We don't want to risk becoming irrelevant or useless due to the way that our content is blocked or filtered currently.

As we develop a greater understanding of the Chinese market, we intend to add more products and services.

The nascent recovery in domestic demand is neither strong enough to warrant an immediate reversal of the August cut, nor weak enough to prompt back-to-back rate cuts.

Our mission in Washington boils down to this: Defend the Internet as a free and open platform for information, communication, and innovation.

Should they be able to speed up their own sites and services, while degrading those offered by competitors? ... What's better: [a] Centralized control by network operators, or [b] free user choice on the decentralized, open, and astoundingly successful end-to-end Internet? (Hint: It's not [a].)